top of page
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2bd88/2bd88df8f7f43355b981a21ea2120411560abbf9" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/84c2a/84c2a56d3cda37a6fe6992efe57950b97e7101fd" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7c791/7c7918a686df03999390233ebbee52e9e2d522ce" alt="website header - modeling science.png"
For years, I assessed in chunks of quiz/test/lab report and averaged the scores together. While I still collect information from students using those tools, I now structure feedback and assessment according to the learning objectives I've written for my courses. Assessment by objective seems like a small change, but it has a huge impact on student mindset and learning. It helps to correct inequitable and racist practices in my former system of assessment. It helps to align instruction and assessment with what I want my students to take away from my course.
​
Combining the influence of numerous master teachers, I've written up some of my experiences, hints, and ideas about Assessment by learning objective below.
​
Note on terms: Assessment by learning objective is widely called Standards-Based Grading. I think of standards as items written by federal or state agencies that set the overall direction of courses, whereas learning objectives are a teacher's translation of standards into student-friendly, pedagogically useful statements that reflect the goals and activities of the course. Additionally, for me assessment as a process of eliciting understanding and generating feedback, while grading refers to placing a numerical or letter value on student work.
Sample Course Learning Objectives
​
Physics (Introductory Algebra-Trig based Modeling Physics course, 9th grade)
Chemistry (Introductory Chemistry, 11th grade)
Astronomy and Modern Physics (Semester elective grades 10-12)
Engineering Principles (Semester elective grades 10-12)
​
​
bottom of page